This Star Trek plotline came to mind during a recent evening when I was trying to photograph Comet Pons-Brooks from a "dark sky" observing spot close to Dunedin.
The comet was only visible for a few hours after sunset. I drove to a favoured location atop Strath Taieri, set up my telescopes and cameras, and began photographing the comet.
The media, perhaps dazzled by Musk’s wealth and evident brilliance, forever speaks to Starlink’s virtues. We hear how Starlink connects people within war zones and allows scientists in the Antarctic to talk to their loved ones when on assignment. We hear it will help us during "emergencies" starting next year here in New Zealand, and our phone networks will become more resilient. Yet we don’t seem to question whether launching an array of tens of thousands of satellites that have to be replaced when they re-enter the atmosphere and are easily visible for hours after dusk or before dawn is good for another connection — that with the night sky.
As an observer, I can tell you that the night sky has changed dramatically over the past five years, and none of us here in New Zealand has had a say in whether that change was a good thing. Across the planet, regions proudly declare themselves "dark sky", yet fundamentally, the sky is no longer dark. Thanks to satellite constellations like Starlink, our view of the heavens is changing; to my mind, this isn’t a good thing.
Satellite constellations make me feel sad for the future.